http://www.nytimes.com/2012/
Op-Ed Contributor
How Charter Schools Can Hurt
By Lucinda Rosenfeld
Published: March 16, 2012
MY daughter is a kindergarten pupil at P.S. 261 in Boerum Hill, 
Brooklyn. She started there in September, and she loves everything about
 it: her friends, her teachers and her school-related activities, like 
Girl Scouts. Intense excitement accompanied both the post office project
 earlier this year and the Halloween Day Characters Parade, in which her class dressed up as the Three Little Pigs.        
Related in Opinion
More on Education »
A few weeks ago, for three days in a row starting at 3 p.m., a representative from the Success Academy charter school
 that is scheduled to open this fall in adjacent Cobble Hill stood 
outside the doors of P.S. 261, handing out fliers and attempting to 
recruit its students. On day two, outraged teachers asked the man to 
leave. He refused. On day three, a loose group of teachers, parents and 
students occupied the sidewalk next to him. Heated words were exchanged.
 It wasn’t until the next day, when a schoolwide rally unfolded in the 
front yard — and cameras from NY1 arrived — that the representative 
vanished. I can’t help wondering if this is the educational future that 
Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg had in mind when, in his State of the City 
address earlier this year, he called for 50 new charter schools to open 
in the next two years.        
Here in the Brownstone Belt, most elementary schools are overwhelmingly 
populated either by poor minorities or middle- to upper-middle-class 
whites. P.S. 261 is one of a minority of Brooklyn primary schools that 
manages to be truly diverse — racially, ethnically and economically. 
While 35 percent of its student body qualifies for free lunch, it also 
attracts and retains children from professional families of all races 
and creeds, who work in law, media and the arts.        
If Success Academy succeeds in luring away even a fraction of 261’s 
students, however, it could well create a snowball effect in which its 
middle-class population ends up fleeing. In New York City, school 
budgets are determined in part by the number of students who attend. So 
fewer kids at P.S. 261 would mean less money for the principal to spend 
on everything from teachers to class trips.        
At the moment, P.S. 261 is doing pretty well. Just recently, the Trust 
for Public Land selected the school to have its playground renovated, 
while a science teacher, Carmelo Piazza (otherwise known as “Carmelo the
 Science Fellow,” a Brooklyn legend in his own right), received a 
$10,000 grant from AT&T to refurbish his lab, which will soon be 
filled with small reptiles.        
For reasons understood only by the statistics-mad New York City Department of Education,
 P.S. 261 recently received a letter grade of “C.” It was also 
designated as a “school in need of improvement.” But so far, in my book,
 considering budget cuts that have wiped out close to a million dollars 
in three years and forced the school library to close for lack of a 
librarian, the place deserves an A or A-minus.        
Other schools nearby could use help as well. Instead of sending taxpayer
 funds to another Success Academy, why not use that same money to try to
 turn some of Brooklyn’s less popular elementary schools into 
institutions that, like P.S. 261, attract parents from across the 
socioeconomic spectrum? In studies, a mix of rich and poor has been 
shown to lift up those at the bottom of the economic pile. As for the 
children of professional families, it’s surely better for them not to 
spend their entire lives around people exactly like them.        
The apparent reason for opening a charter school in a gentrified 
neighborhood like Cobble Hill (or the Upper West Side, where a Success 
Academy opened last year) is to bring more middle-class and 
upper-middle-class families into the publicly funded charter system. But
 if the Success Academy succeeds in its mission, it could well end up 
destroying schools like P.S. 261 that already succeed in attracting 
these families. My daughter’s new friends include the children of both 
marketing executives and maintenance workers. At drop-off recently, I 
watched as she and a friend who lives in a nearby housing project walked
 hand in hand down the hall. In its promise of a more just world, the 
sight made me almost teary-eyed. I wonder how much longer those kinds of
 scenes will prevail.        
The communities of Boerum Hill and Cobble Hill overwhelmingly do not
 support a charter in the neighborhood. (The same is true in 
Williamsburg, where, despite a huge outcry, another Success Academy was 
recently rubber-stamped.) This has been made abundantly clear at both 
community meetings and those for the Panel for Educational Policy. 
Perhaps the mayor believes he knows better than the thousands of 
families who have come out to voice their opposition. But then, wasn’t 
the whole point of the “school choice” movement to give power back to 
the parents?        
There’s nothing wrong with providing families with options. When 
charters open in their own privately financed, state-of-the-art 
buildings in poverty-stricken neighborhoods where they’re welcomed by 
the community, there may be reasons to celebrate. But when charters 
co-locate in mixed-income areas, choice is only half the story.        
The existing schools in which they set up shop suffer both in terms of 
resources (only so many kids can fit in the lunchroom at one time) and 
morale. If the Cobble Hill Success Academy opens as planned in the 
Brooklyn School for Global Studies, which also houses a second high 
school and a special-needs program, in five years the building will be 
at 108 percent capacity — unless, of course, the other schools shrivel 
up and die.        
Call us paranoid, but parents like me are starting to wonder whether 
Mayor Bloomberg’s larger goal isn’t to privatize the entire New York 
City public school system. Why else would he be foisting charters on 
communities that don’t want them? And how else can he justify diverting 
tax dollars to organizations that employ people to blanket neighborhoods
 with advertisements and try to poach students from public schools that 
are already thriving?        
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment