Cowan and Kessler: Economic Populism Is a Dead End for Democrats
The de Blasio-Warren agenda won't travel. Colorado is the real political harbinger.
Dec. 2, 2013 6:57 p.m. ET
If you talk to leading progressives these
days, you'll be sure to hear this message: The Democratic Party should
embrace the economic populism of New York Mayor-elect
Bill de Blasio
and Massachusetts Sen.
Elizabeth Warren.
Such economic populism, they argue, should be the guiding star
for Democrats heading into 2016. Nothing would be more disastrous for
Democrats.
While New Yorkers think of
their city as the center of the universe, the last time its mayor won a
race for governor or senator—let alone president—was 1869. For the past
144 years, what has happened in the Big Apple stayed in the Big Apple.
Some liberals believe Sen. Warren would be the Democratic Party's
strongest presidential candidate in 2016. But what works in
midnight-blue Massachusetts—a state that has had a Republican senator
for a total of 152 weeks since 1979—hasn't sold on a national level
since 1960.
The political problems of
liberal populism are bad enough. Worse are the actual policies proposed
by left-wing populists. The movement relies on a potent "we can have it
all" fantasy that goes something like this: If we force the wealthy to
pay higher taxes (there are 300,000 tax filers who earn more than $1
million), close a few corporate tax loopholes, and break up some big
banks then—presto!—we can pay for, and even expand, existing
entitlements. Meanwhile, we can invest more deeply in K-12 education,
infrastructure, health research, clean energy and more.
Social
Security is exhibit A of this populist political and economic fantasy. A
growing cascade of baby boomers will be retiring in the coming years,
and the Social Security formula increases their initial benefits faster
than inflation. The problem is that since 2010 Social Security payouts
to seniors have exceeded payroll taxes collected from workers. This
imbalance widens inexorably until it devours the entire Social Security
Trust Fund in 2031, according to the Congressional Budget Office. At
that point, benefits would have to be slashed by about 23%.
New York City Mayor-elect Bill de Blasio
Getty Images
Undeterred by this undebatable
solvency crisis, Sen. Warren wants to increase benefits to all seniors,
including billionaires, and to pay for them by increasing taxes on
working people and their employers. Her approach requires a $750 billion
tax hike over the next 10 years that hits mostly Millennials and Gen
Xers, plus another $750 billion tax on the businesses that employ them.
Even
more reckless is the populists' staunch refusal to address the coming
Medicare crisis. In 2030, a typical couple reaching the eligibility age
of 65 will have paid $180,000 in lifetime Medicare taxes but will get
back $664,000 in benefits. Given that this disparity will be completely
unaffordable, Sen. Warren and her acolytes are irresponsibly pushing off
budget decisions that will guarantee huge benefit cuts and further tax
hikes for Gen Xers and Millennials in a few decades.
As
for the promise that unrestrained entitlements won't harm kids and
public investments like infrastructure, public schools and college
financial aid, haven't we seen this movie before? In the 1960s, the
federal government spent $3 on such investments for every $1 on
entitlements.
Today, the ratio is
flipped. In 10 years, we will spend $5 on the three major entitlement
programs (Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid) for every $1 on public
investments. And that is without the new expansion of entitlement
benefits that the Warren wing of the Democratic Party is proposing.
Liberal populists do not even attempt to address this collision course
between the Great Society safety net and the New Frontier investments.
On
the same day that Bill de Blasio won in New York City, a referendum to
raise taxes on high-income Coloradans to fund public education and
universal pre-K failed in a landslide. This is the type of state that
Democrats captured in 2008 to realign the national electoral map, and
they did so through offering a vision of pragmatic progressive
government, not fantasy-based blue-state populism. Before Democrats
follow Sen. Warren and Mayor-elect de Blasio over the populist cliff,
they should consider Colorado as the true 2013 Election Day harbinger of
American liberalism.
Mr. Cowan
is president of the think tank Third Way, where
Mr. Kessler
is senior vice president for policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment