Rarely is the choice between salary and class size presented in such a stark manner.I truly hope that the CTU rejects the raise in favor of sticking by class size limits that are still too large, but as many of NYC teacher friends remind me, I am not a teacher…. I would like to hear from teachers on the list about what they would choose if confronted with such a decision, and why.
Let's be careful here.
Incoming President from CORE Karen
"Lewis urged the board to first cut expensive curriculum created by outsiders, high-stakes testing and a long line of pricey vendors and consultants. "I would implore you to reconsider,'
Yes there are other choices and we must not let the people who have run these systems into the ground manipulate events to pit parents against teachers - the goal here.
IN Chicago I believe they can't negotiate class size in contracts and one of the planks of CORE is to get that right. Let's look into the future: CORE gives in now on the raise but loses enough internal power that the long-time fight for class size is harmed. I believe they are committed to fighting for salary and class size - not like the UFT - see below.
Do they really fear a strike? Would they in NYC from the UFT which would lose dues checkoff and everyone know they will never strike no matter what happens. Neither would the old guard in Chicago. But with CORE being more militant, there is some doubt.
We must be clear who is framing the choice. If a body like the DOE signs a contract and wants to get out of it the use the class size issue to turn the public against the teachers. BloomKlein tried to do the same thing here in not giving teachers a raise - but there is no contract so they can get away with it.
By the way - I got a call from Chicago yesterday and they tell me there is talk of furloughs - up to 10 days.
We can't keep falling for this tactic.
What is to stop them from making other claims? Books and supplies or class size?
Bus service or class size? It is extortion.
In NYC take the 42 minutes that many teachers think is a waste. Would they be happy losing the money if they cut these minutes?
Remember in NYC in 1975 they cut the school week by an hour and a half - 2 periods and the teachers gave up 2 preps a week in the fiscal crisis. Teachers also took a pay freeze for years.
We would hear screams of outrage. So why if Chicago teachers are due a 4% raise do we fall for this ploy?
We face a similar issue in the UFT when we want class size included in contract negotiations and the UFT always says it will come out of a raise. Now if we had a democratic union this issue would be debated and we would see where teachers really stand on the issue. UFT surveys often put the same issue in stark terms without nuance.
Subject: [nyceducationnews] Chicago choice between pay freeze and class size increases; what would you choose?
http://www.suntimes
During a dramatic emergency meeting, board members also blocked any chance of a teacher strike over pay by indicating they expect to honor the 4 percent pay raises promised to teachers and seven other school unions -- an increase valued at $135 million.
“During a dramatic emergency meeting, board members also blocked any chance of a teacher strike over pay by indicating they expect to honor the 4 percent pay raises promised to teachers and seven other school unions -- an increase valued at $135 million.
….Although the Civic Federation has questioned the board's decision to raise class size by five students to save $125 million rather than take on the union over pay increases, Bobins {Chicago school board president] said, "We signed a five-year contract three years ago. . . . I believe we must honor it…. Huberman [CEO of the Chicago schools] said, he could not risk any chance of a strike over the promised 4 percent pay raises. A class size increase that could displace 2,700 teachers and 300 non-teachers, Huberman said, was "not the first place we turned, it's the last place we turned.''
Rarely is the choice between salary and class size presented in such a stark manner.
I truly hope that the CTU rejects the raise in favor of sticking by class size limits that are still too large, but as many of NYC teacher friends remind me, I am not a teacher…. I would like to hear from teachers on the list about what they would choose if confronted with such a decision, and why.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/education/2397688,CST-NWS-skul16.article
Chicago School Board opens door to 35 in a class
Board expects to honor 4% raise, but hopes teachers union will back concessions
June 16, 2010
BY ROSALIND ROSSI Education Reporter
Chicago School Board members Tuesday tackled their worst fiscal crisis since Mayor Daley's 1995 school takeover by granting school officials the power to raise class sizes to up to 35 students for the next two years.
If Schools CEO Ron Huberman acts on that new power, he's sure to anger hundreds of teachers laid off in the process and potentially the parents whose children they serve.
Outgoing Chicago Teachers Union President Marilyn Stewart (left) speaks Tuesday, joined by incoming president Karen Lewis.
(Brian Jackson/Sun-Times)
(Brian Jackson/Sun-
During a dramatic emergency meeting, board members also blocked any chance of a teacher strike over pay by indicating they expect to honor the 4 percent pay raises promised to teachers and seven other school unions -- an increase valued at $135 million.
At the same time, the board agreed to give Huberman the authority to take out a line of credit of up to $800 million. The short-term bridge, Huberman said, is needed to cover more than $400 million in late state aid payments and pump up a reserve fund that will soon dwindle to the equivalent of one week's operating costs.
Facing a packed chamber, seven school board members unanimously approved every emergency measure brought before them to help plug an estimated $427 million deficit. Rookie School Board President Mary Richardson-Lowry called the moment "extraordinary.''
The veteran of the bunch, LaSalle Bank chairman emeritus Norm Bobins, said he was casting "the most difficult vote'' of his 15 years on the board.
Although the Civic Federation has questioned the board's decision to raise class size by five students to save $125 million rather than take on the union over pay increases, Bobins said, "We signed a five-year contract three years ago. . . . I believe we must honor it.''
Forgoing pay increases would only get the district a third of the way out of its financial hole, Bobins noted. Nevertheless, he said, "I hope we can come to some consensus with the union and meet each other halfway.''
Huberman cautioned that the board's budget was "fluid and changes by the day'' because of uncertain state funding, and he was merely asking for the authority to raise class sizes if needed.
However, Huberman said, he could not risk any chance of a strike over the promised 4 percent pay raises. A class size increase that could displace 2,700 teachers and 300 non-teachers, Huberman said, was "not the first place we turned, it's the last place we turned.''
It came after 800 nonunion workers lost their jobs, and those left behind endured pay freezes and furlough days that ate up 6 percent of their paychecks, Huberman said.
District officials have given the teachers union "a menu of possible concessions,'' and "we remain hopeful that [the union] will share in recognizing the challenges almost every district across the country is facing,'' Huberman said.
San Diego teachers, he noted, have agreed to five furlough days to avoid layoffs; Las Vegas teachers are swallowing a pay freeze and increased medical co-pays.
In an unusual display of solidarity, at one point both incoming Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis and outgoing President Marilyn Stewart stood together at the podium as Stewart railed against the class size increase, calling it "educational malpractice.''
"I am ashamed of the Board of Education,'' Stewart said. Lewis hugged her afterward.
Lewis urged the board to first cut expensive curriculum created by outsiders, high-stakes testing and a long line of pricey vendors and consultants. "I would implore you to reconsider,'' Lewis said. "This is a nuclear option.''
Afterward, Burley School parent Wendy Katten, who helped organize a parent rally against class size increases and the state education-funding system, predicted that North Side parents who have raised huge amounts of money for their neighborhood schools will bail out if their children wind up in packed classrooms.
"There are parents who are saying, 'I'm done working this hard when you're saying 35 kids,' " Katten said. "People are saying they'll sell their house at a loss. They are out of here.''
Daley tried to shift the political blame to Springfield, saying, "It's the state of Illinois that basically is cutting [education] funding . . .
"The Board of Education is not the enemy,'' Daley said. ". . . They don't want big classes. No one wants any big classes.''
Contributing: Fran Spielman
No comments:
Post a Comment