Take the docket/case index number to WebCivilSupreme, plug it in, and you can find the status of the case. Also (and perhaps) the brief is on line; otherwise Findlaw.com
I feel strongly that the UFT is going to lose; the Courts have always been reluctant to interfere in educational issues and this is no different. I also feel that Mulgrew is going thru the motions to save face, esp. in an election cycle. Yes, I could be could be wrong.
but that is my gut feeling.
THIS CASE BELONGS IN FEDERAL COURT - THE MAYOR'S PLAN AND "NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND" VIOLATES THE 14TH AMMENDMENT.
Norman Thomas HS
FK: She's - Judge Joan Lobis - got a very bad record and is very unsympathetic. Not a good sign
|PLAINTIFF - (MULGREW)||STROOCK STROOCK & LAVAN LLP,|
|180 MAIDEN LANE,|
|NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10038|
|DEFENDANT - (LAW DEPT.)||CORPORATION COUNSEL|
|100 CHURCH STREET, 4TH FLOOR|
|NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10007|
By MOTION, originally made returnable on February 24, 2010, A PARTY MOVED THIS COURT, in MOTION PART, seeking the following relief: ARTICLE 78. This motion is currently pending before the court and is assigned to Judge LOBIS, JOAN B.
This is the next scheduled appearance for this motion.
Complete Motion Appearance Activity:
On February 24, 2010, an appearance is scheduled on this motion before Judge LOBIS, JOAN B. in MOTION PART.