The Labor Educator
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 6:31 PM
Subject: Labor's Voice for Change (35) May 14, 2009
Labor's Voice for Change (35) May 14, 2009
AFL-CIO TELLS UNORGANIZED WORKERS:
NOW IS NOT THE TIME TO JOIN A UNION
BY HARRY KELBER
The AFL-CIO has been conducting the biggest lobbying campaign in its
history to persuade Congress to approve the Employee Free Choice Act.
It started its EFCA campaign about four years ago, and since then, it
has been pouring countless millions of dollars into a full-scale
campaign to make EFCA a top priority issue for the labor movement. It
has inspired a continuous bombardment of e-mails to lawmakers to win
their support for the measure.
The AFL-CIO’s case for EFCA is clear and straightforward. Employers
are using intimidation, coercion and the threat of discharge to
pressure their employees from forming or joining a union. Union
leaders say that an EFCA law would “level the playing field”
between labor and management. It would make it easier for workers to
join a union by signing an authorization card, rather than by voting
in a Labor Board election, where employers can influence the outcome.
It is the “card check” system that has aroused fierce opposition
from employer groups.
One of the unfortunate side-effects of the EFCA campaign is that
union organizing is at a virtual standstill. Labor leaders are holding
back on their recruiting plans until the passage of a “card check”
law, when they expect huge lines of workers ready to join.
In their quest for EFCA, labor leaders have sent a wrong-headed
message to unorganized workers. We’ve told them that unions are too
weak to protect them from their employers, and that now is not the
time to join a union because they might get fired. This is a message
they are likely to remember when, in the future, a union organizer
shows up at their workplace.
What If Labor’s Gamble for EFCA Is Lost or Delayed?
A strategic mistake by the AFL-CIO leadership is in not mobilizing
unorganized workers to play an active role in the EFCA campaign. After
all, they are the ones who would be the principal beneficiaries of the
legislation, giving them the right to join a union and enjoy its
benefits.
While union members everywhere have supported the EFCA campaign and
are looking forward to its passage, they would also deem it wise and
prudent to plan on alternatives in case Congress does not approve the
legislation.
There are events that might make a difference: huge rallies at the
home of every legislator who is uncommitted or intends to vote "No" on
EFCA; a National Labor March in Washington; a 2-hour national work
stoppage or some other attention-getting action that dramatizes EFCA
as a life-and-death issue for the labor movement.
* * * * *
Right now, unions are still waiting — and hoping — that Congress
will act favorably and soon on EFCA, although there is no guarantee
that it will. It is disheartening to learn that a small group of
Democratic Senators, led by Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California,
intends to vote “no”, when EFCA comes up for a vote. Equally
disturbing is the undenied rumor that the Obama administration is
looking for a compromise on EFCA that would satisfy the business
community.
If there is a lesson to be learned from the current struggle over the
Employee Free Choice Act, it is that you win legislative battles by
exhibiting your strengths, not your weaknesses. Pleading is never as
effective as demanding in dealing with opponents.
Article 36 of “Labor’s Voice for Change” will be posted on
Tuesday. May 19.
No comments:
Post a Comment