Monday, October 26, 2009

Ted Sizer

Leonie Haimson sent this about Ted Sizer, who died recently.


Ted Sizer, who died last week, was one of the founders, along with Debbie Meier, of the small schools movement, in which smaller classes were seen as one of the essential components of successful schools. See below obituary in the Boston Globe.

Yet when Gates and Carnegie foundation seized the movement, and created a new wave of small schools, they no longer recognized small classes as necessary. In fact, they went so far as to consciously exclude class size as a factor to be studied in any of the numerous studies they financed that analyzed the possible reasons for the success or failure of small schools they financed.

Many of the groups that the Gates foundation continue to support in NYC have continued in this vein, discounting (or ignoring) the importance of class size in their analyses and efforts. But Sizer knew better:

“Get the class size numbers down,’’ he told the Globe in 1996. “Give me a small school where teachers want to work together . . . and I’ll show you a school that doesn’t need a metal detector, I’ll show you a school without a high dropout rate, I’ll show you a school where children are doing well."

Sizer started as headmaster of Phillips Academy where class sizes were and continue to be very small -- 14 or less; and unlike many others including those in this administration who sent their own kids to elite private schools with small classes, he was consistent in his message that inner city kids need and deserve these sorts of quality conditions as much as the children of the wealthy -- if not more.

Perhaps Debbie would like to add some reflections on Sizer?

Theodore Sizer, 77; leader in effort to overhaul education

Theodore Sizer spent decades trying to change the way educators look at schools and to show how to create places where students can flourish.

“Inconveniently, no two children and no two schools are ever quite alike,’’ he wrote for the Globe’s Ideas section in 2005 as he criticized the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, and its embrace of a standardized approach, as “astonishingly unimaginative.’’

Imagination was something Dr. Sizer seemed to have in endless supply as he led educational institutions grand and modest, from the world famous to the relatively obscure. Only 31 when he was named dean of the Harvard Graduate School of Education, he subsequently focused on smaller places. After Harvard, he was headmaster of Phillips Academy in Andover, and later, with his wife, was co-principal of Francis W. Parker Charter Essential School in Danvers.

Dr. Sizer, who also turned the gathered wisdom of his research into a popular trio of books featuring Horace, a fictional high school teacher, died of colon cancer Wednesday in his Harvard home. He was 77.

“He was the most articulate, most forceful, and most convincing voice for American progressive education in the last decades,’’ said Howard Gardner, a professor at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. “And his influence occurred via his writings, the institutions he created, and the deeply humane care he took with the many hundreds of individuals, famous or not, whose paths he crossed over that time.’’

Dr. Sizer, who also served in the 1980s as chairman of the education department at Brown University, founded the Coalition for Essential Schools in 1984, which spread his approach and theories across the country through schools that adhere to a set of common principles.

Among those are the belief that teachers should be directly responsible for no more than 80 students and get to know each child in depth. Also included in the principles is “less is more,’’ a phrase Dr. Sizer often repeated and one that runs counter to prevailing trends toward standardized testing that require students to memorize a broad range of facts in a multitude of subjects.

“Rather than try to cram thousands of facts into a kid’s head, decide what’s really important and spend more time on it, on powerful concepts, rather than trivia that they forget after the test is over,’’ Gardner said. “What Ted would say is what’s missing now is the desire to learn, the passion to learn.’’

Dr. Sizer believed schools should inspire students to want to read and expand their knowledge even when tests weren’t looming. Students, he would say, should develop “habits of mind.’’

Affiliate schools, according to the Coalition for Essential Schools website, include Boston schools such as Boston Arts Academy, Boston Day and Evening Academy, Fenway High School, and Mission Hill School, along with Meridian Academy in Brookline and Brimmer and May School in Chestnut Hill.

In 1994, Dr. Sizer also founded and was the first director of the Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. Two years later, in an interview with the Globe, he articulated a change that could have an immediate impact.

“Get the class size numbers down,’’ he told the Globe in 1996. “Give me a small school where teachers want to work together . . . and I’ll show you a school that doesn’t need a metal detector, I’ll show you a school without a high dropout rate, I’ll show you a school where children are doing well. These big, standardized, mechanized institutions that we received from our well-intentioned grandparents don’t work anymore. All that you have to do is shadow a child at school throughout the day. By the end of the day, you are so angry and bored that it is no surprise that students drop out. Nobody is doing anything.’’

Theodore Ryland Sizer was born in New Haven, the youngest of six children and the only son. He attended Pomfret School in Pomfret, Conn., before going to Yale University, from which he graduated in 1953 with a bachelor’s in English literature. Enlisting in the Army, he rose to the rank of captain and, in 1955, married Nancy Faust.

He spent his first years in education teaching at Roxbury Latin School and at Melbourne Grammar School in Australia. Using the GI Bill, he went to Harvard, where he received a master’s and a doctorate in education and history.

Dr. Sizer began teaching at Harvard and was named dean of the education graduate school in 1964, staying in that post until becoming headmaster of Phillips Academy in 1972.

“Phillips Academy has lost a legendary headmaster; the nation, a great visionary and an innovative leader of education reform,’’ Barbara Chase, head of school, said in a letter to Phillips Academy. “Yet we always will be richer for what he has left us: a sense of how schools can be their best - centered, rigorous, and most importantly, inspirational places for our young people, the nation’s future.’’

Leaving Phillips Academy in 1981, Dr. Sizer studied secondary schools around the country, research that formed the foundation of three influential books: “Horace’s Compromise: The Dilemma of the American High School,’’ in 1984; “Horace’s School: Redesigning the American High School,’’ in 1992; and “Horace’s Hope: What Works for the American High School.’’

Creating Horace, a composite character that was a high school teacher, he used the three books to explore the failings of education in the nation and how to create better institutions of learning.

Dr. Sizer had written books before that were tailored to an academic audience, but with the Horace trilogy, his wife said, “he thought: ‘I want to reach a wider group of people. I want them to hear what I have seen and what I think. How can I do this?’ ’’ She encouraged him to draw from the stories and vignettes he brought home from his travels to high schools as the framing narrative.

Although Dr. Sizer’s research and charisma could hold the attention of any room, he often preferred to listen and learn from those who inevitably gathered around him.

“I think he was always part of the conversation,’’ his wife said, “but he was sometimes a more silent partner than you would have expected from a guy who was the most prestigious guy in the room.’’

“It wasn’t that he demanded attention, he commanded attention by virtue of his ideas,’’ Gardner said. “He used ordinary words to create powerful ideas. That’s not true of many people in education.’’

In addition to his wife, Dr. Sizer leaves two sons, Theodore II of Stuttgart, Germany, and Hal of West Simsbury, Conn.; two daughters, Judith of Cambridge and Lyde of Hastings-on-Hudson, N.Y.; two sisters, Hilda Sizer Warner of Washington, D.C., and Elizabeth Sizer Allen of Redding, Conn.; and 10 grandchildren.

A memorial service will be held at 2 p.m. on Nov. 21 in Memorial Church at Harvard University. Burial is private.

KossSteve Comments on Flat Earth Society: column by Andy Wolf


The recently released NAEP Mathematics results showing virtually no progress among New York State students should engender serious doubt in the public mind over the State’s and City’s extravagant claims of unparalleled educational progress in recent years. In an October 24 posting (“The Flat Earth Society”) in the New York Sun, columnist Andrew Wolf wrote:
Last year, replying to Sol Stern in an online debate published on the blog Eduwonk, Mr. Cerf proclaimed, “While the NAEP is important evidence of progress, it is not ‘high stakes,’ not based on state standards, and given to a comparatively small sample. At minimum, the significance of the NAEP needs to be considered in the larger context of state tests, which are high-stakes and are taken by all.”
For anyone involved in or concerned about pre-college education in the State or City of New York (administrators, teachers, students, parents, college admissions officers, or employers), this statement by Christopher Cerf (a former deputy chancellor at the DOE!) is nothing short of a nightmare, an inadvertent admission of educational ignorance and irrefutable evidence of a horrifying lack of common sense. Let’s take a moment to analyze Mr. Cerf’s three objections to the relevance of the NAEP (exams which, by the way, are commonly accepted as the gold standard of American educational measurement):
“…it [the NAEP] is not ‘high stakes’”
This is a simply extraordinary statement that effectively argues the merits of high stakes tests as the only ones that count, as if students (and their teachers) do not and will not take any other kinds of measurements seriously enough to validate them. This despite years of sociological research supporting Campbell’s Law, which states that, “The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.” In other words, the higher the stakes, the more likely people will be to do things (overemphasize the measured areas at the expense of other areas, under-report negative events, or simply lie or cheat) that make the resulting measurements meaningless. Annual state testing in NYC public schools has come to reflect just these types of self-corrupting behaviors.
In reality, Mr. Cerf’s statement is a coded way of saying, “We (the Mayor and the DOE) have no way to exert pressure on principals and teachers to drill and prep students endlessly for the NAEP. If we can’t use that test to threaten principals’ bonuses, teachers’ jobs, or a school’s continued existence enough to make them do whatever it takes to show results, then it simply isn’t relevant to the reality we’ve decided to construct.” They (the Bloomberg DOE) want to measure preparation for rote regurgitation in response to questions on the same narrow scope, of the same form, and of nearly the same content year after year; the NAEP measures knowledge and understanding and is intelligently constructed to measure a wide range of grade-appropriate content. Which do you trust as a measure of mathematics education?
“[it is] not based on state standards”
Whose state standards define what mathematics children should know? Mississippi’s? North Carolina’s? California’s, Indiana’s, Massachusetts’, Alabama’s? On what basis does Mr. Cerf believe that New York’s are better, or that this state’s assessment of those standards is better? It is already common knowledge that nearly every state has lowered its assessments and/or its proficiency bars in the absurd NCLB race for Lake Wobegon-style, one hundred percent proficiency by 2014.
In any event, why should state standards not be adequate for students to measure well against any professionally-developed test of mathematics knowledge. Mathematics understanding should not depend on whether a child lives in West Virginia, Colorado, or New York.
I can’t help wondering if Mr. Cerf has ever deigned to take a look at the sample questions the National Center for Education Statistics publishes on their website, just to get a sense of what it means to claim that the NAEP is inapplicable to New York State’s children. As someone who believes you should argue from facts, I’ve looked at them – as they do after every exam, they have released a new set of sample questions (31 Grade 4 questions, 34 Grade 8 questions). Speaking as a former math teacher, they are marvelous, beautifully constructed to elicit underlying math understanding and knowledge independent of “state standards” and curricula or textbooks used. I see nothing in them that I wouldn’t want my fourth or eighth grade child able to answer by that age and grade level.
Here’s one nice example from Grade 8: “A certain even number is divisible by 9. This number is between 100 and 120. What is the number?” How can Mr. Cerf honestly assert that it’s unreasonable to think that a NYC eighth grade student should not be prepared to answer this question?
“[it is] given to a comparatively small sample”
This objection is the most blatantly outrageous of the three, either a measure of the speaker’s utter lack of mathematical education or (still worse) a hypocritical perpetuation of the fallacy (believed by far too many) that the only statistically valid surveys come from enormous sample populations if not the entire population. Yet Mr. Cerf would no doubt be quick to defend any legitimate survey of New Yorkers (usually constructed from interviews of no more than 1,200 citizens) showing the Mayor’s popularity, his lead over his opponent in the upcoming election, or his contention that New Yorkers favor his education policies (thanks to millions of dollars of DOE and other money spent on endlessly upbeat and often (deliberately) factually misleading public relations.
One can only hope that the only a “comparatively small sample” of New Yorkers will vote in a mayor-for-life in the coming election and, when he shuts the door behind him, the Mayor makes sure that hangers-on like Mr. Cerf are where they usually are: close behind him.

To build on the metaphor offered by the Daily News and continued by Andy Wolf, educationally speaking, we’re not only sailing toward the edge of the flat earth, we’re being piloted there – complete with deranged laughter -- by obsessed, Ahab-like captain Michael Bloomberg and his lieutenants like Joel Klein and Chris Cerf. Even worse, thanks to the likes of Michelle Rhee and Arne Duncan, other ships are gleefully following us right over the edge.

Steve Koss


-----Original Message-----
From: leonie@att.net
To: nyc education news yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Oct 25, 2009 9:53 am
Subject: [nyceducationnews] Flat Earth Society: column by Andy Wolf

another excellent column by Andy Wolf, which reveals the stunning fact that Chris Cerf was a recent candidate for NY State Ed Commissioner. What a coup that would have been for the Bloomberg/Klein forces -- and the end of any hope for keeping them accountable.

Flat Earth Society

By ANDREW WOLF | October 24, 2009
No sooner did the Daily News lambast critics of Mayor Bloomberg’s educational program as “flat earth” adherents than the federal NAEP math test released its results, which undermine the mayor’s claims for academic improvements on his watch.
It seems that New York’s NAEP scores have been stagnating, despite the fact that scores on the state tests, on which the mayor bases his claims, have been soaring. It’s surprising to see the editors of the New York’s Picture Newspaper miss this frame of reference, as they did, in an editorial on Sunday October 18.
They opine that the NAEP results are for the state, not the city. Aside from the fact that the city makes up a big part of the state, they miss one critical point. The disparity between the state test results and NAEP is so wide as to cast doubt on the state testing program in every corner of the Empire State from Buffalo to Montauk as well as in our five boroughs.
To base any evaluation of our schools on bogus testing — and even pay bonuses (with your tax dollars) on the basis of the state scores — is nonsensical. The education expert Diane Ravitch suggests that the new leadership at the State Education Department fire those responsible. I would urge a full investigation of who knew what and when about the creation and management of the state testing program, which has millions of young victims.
The NAEP results are certainly bad news for the Bloomberg campaign. If the state scores are bogus, now increasingly accepted as fact, then the Bloomberg education legend is exposed as mythology.
Christopher Cerf, the former deputy chancellor at the Department of Education, was furiously spinning this disastrous news in his new temporary post working in the Bloomberg reelection effort. Mr. Cerf, according to the New York Times, “said that when the New York City numbers become public, they could show that city students outperformed their peers in the rest of the state.” The Gray Lady quoted him as saying: “It would be impossible to draw any conclusions about New York City’s progress at this point.”
Mr. Cerf has a history in spinning NAEP results, which have never been particularly kind to Tweed. Last year, replying to Sol Stern in an online debate published on the blog Eduwonk, Mr. Cerf proclaimed, “While the NAEP is important evidence of progress, it is not ‘high stakes,’ not based on state standards, and given to a comparatively small sample. At minimum, the significance of the NAEP needs to be considered in the larger context of state tests, which are high-stakes and are taken by all.”
Parent activist Leonie Haimson pointed out in a comment on Mr. Cerf’s posting at the time that the fact that the NAEP is not “high stakes” makes the results all the more reliable.
Mr. Cerf was merely reprising the comments of the former state education commissioner, Richard Mills, which I reported in the New York Sun nearly two years ago on December, 21, 2007. “Given that NAEP and state tests, as well as the related standards, are prepared separately, it's inevitable that national and state results will be different. In some states the difference is large, while it's small in others. This presents an obvious question for the public and policy makers: which results are correct?"
I went on to state that “Mr. Mills believes that the lower standards exhibited by the New York state/NAEP gap, among the widest gaps in the nation, are more accurate and goes on to give a list of reasons. These include the remarkable claim that ‘teachers and students perceive that stakes are high for performance on the New York tests and students are encouraged to do their best. There are no consequences to a school or a student from NAEP.’”
Given the similarity in the points of view of Messrs. Mills and Cerf, it might well be appropriate to thank those Regents who rebuffed the effort to make Mr. Cerf state education commissioner. Surely the pupils in the state are better off with Commissioner David Steiner’s commitment to high standards and real reform.
If the children of New York State, and those here in the city, are to get the education they deserve — and NAEP tells us they are not getting it — we need real reform, not smoke and mirrors. For if the earth is as flat as the Daily News says, we are currently sailing for the edge.


When Govenment Attacks a Union

This is exactly what has been done to education.....underfunded for years...then a case is made for failure, and privatization!!! Lisa


Studies have revealed that the Central Light Company

hasn't been funded for years, in preparation to make the

case that it's nonfunctional. A 2005 report showed that

the company had not installed new generating capacity

since 1974.



Privatization of the parastate company lurks behind the

liquidation on October 10. Marchers carried signs that

warned "Today it's us - tomorrow PEMEX [the national oil

company]
and SEP [the education system]," and "No to

privatization."




-----Original Message-----

Subject: Mexico's Union Bust Reveals Flaws in NAFTA

Mexico's Union Bust Reveals Flaws in NAFTA

Laura Carlsen

Foreign Policy In Focus

October 22, 2009

http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/6519



Fernando Lopez woke up on a Sunday morning out of a job.

For the electrical worker, the feeling was terrifying.



"From one day to the next, they left us with no job -

nothing," Lopez said, as he marched alongside some

200,000 fellow workers and their supporters in downtown

Mexico City on October 15.



On the night of Saturday, October 10, thousands of

soldiers and federal police moved into position in the

darkness. After cutting fences and forcing out the

workers, they occupied over 50 installations of the

state-owned utility company, Central Light and Power

(Luz y Fuerza), awaiting the administrative blow that

would follow. At midnight, President Felipe Calderon

issued an executive decree to liquidate the company and

its union, the Mexican Electrical Workers Union

(Sindicato Mexicano de Electricistas - SME), one of the

strongest and most vocal independent unions in the

nation.



The move had been carefully prepared by the government.

Troop movements throughout the central part of the

country serviced by Central Light went unnoticed under

cover of the massive mobilization of security forces

fighting the militarized drug war.



The decree follows a union conflict that the government

fueled and then took advantage of to eliminate the

company and its union. Union elections last June were

contested amid rumors that the federal government was

actively fomenting division. In a warning sign, on

October 5 the Secretary of Labor, Javier Lozano,

rejected registration of the new union leadership

without waiting for a decision from the labor tribunal.

The "Sabadazo," or Saturday Offensive, took place when

the union and the government were still in talks.



NAFTA and the Battle Over Who Will Pay For the Crisis



I talked to Lopez because of the simple poignancy of the

bright green sign he carried: "President Calderon - Your

children eat well. Mine don't."



Similar signs read, "And now what do I do? What will my

family eat?" Marchers revealed that the political issues

of privatization and opposition to the Calderon

government are prominent in the movement but above all,

workers feel that their very survival is under attack.



The ravenous right has set out to prove that it's not

the rich who will pay for the crisis. One of the

arguments for eliminating Central Light and its union

was that it employed too many people, making it

"inefficient." For the Calderon government, offering

decent employment to more than 40,000 families is a

crime in a year when unemployment has doubled and nearly

800,000 Mexican workers have lost jobs due to the

crisis.



The Mexican economy is at a crossroads as it faces a

multi-billion dollar deficit this year. Due to its heavy

dependency on the U.S. economy under NAFTA, it is the

hardest hit country in Latin America and predicts a 7.5%

drop in GDP for 2009. The number of poor has increased

above pre-NAFTA levels, leaving millions more families

in poverty, while the unemployment rate has doubled.



The congressional leader of Calderon's National Action

Party, Mario Alberto Becerra, estimated that even after

doling out severance pay, the government will save money

through the reduced costs of operating Central Light.

The government plans to use some of that money for hand-

out programs for the poor, a model it considers

preferable to maintaining unionized workers in jobs.

Treasury Secretary Agustin Carstens announced that the

42,000 SME workers will be replaced with 10,000 new

hires. He didn't say any would be hired back; the

message was clear - union members need not apply.



Obama promised a renegotiation of NAFTA to incorporate

the toothless labor side agreement into the text and

integrate core International Labor Organization

principles in defense of workers' rights. At the recent

Summit of North American Leaders he said that the

promise has been placed on the back burner. But that

burner seems to be turned off. At an October 19 meeting

between trade representatives of the three NAFTA

nations, they reaffirmed their commitment to the trade

agreement with no mention of renegotiation.



Unionized workers are not the only ones who suffer.

NAFTA has displaced some two million Mexican small

farmers in the countryside due to competition with U.S.

agricultural imports. A recent ruling of a NAFTA

tribunal delivered a record ruling of $77.3 million to

Cargill Incorporated to compensate the company for a

government program that blocked the use of corn syrup to

save Mexico's sugar industry - an industry heavily

protected in the United States. NAFTA's investment

provisions (known as "Chapter 11") allow corporations to

sue governments under special tribunals as one of the

many privileges offered transnational corporations under

the agreement. This obscene ruling to one of the world's

wealthiest agrobusinesses illustrates the priorities of

NAFTA and the constant erosion of worker's rights and

livelihoods.



When NAFTA was being negotiated in the early 90s, many

U.S. unions still considered Mexican workers the enemy

of their members as unfair competition in an

increasingly globalized workforce. That attitude has now

changed.



An October 15 declaration of the AFL-CIO states:



On behalf of over 11 million working women and men of

the United States, the AFL-CIO condemns this unilateral

action by the Mexican authorities, which effectively

destroys the SME and the trade union rights of the Luz y

Fuerza workers. Regrettably, the Mexican Government has

employed similar acts of intervention and repression

against the Mexican Miners and Metalworkers Union.



The AFL-CIO supports the following demands of the SME

and of the Luz y Fuerza workers to reverse this

egregious act of union-busting and violation of

internationally recognized standards of freedom of

association and collective bargaining: 1) a revocation

of the government decree unilaterally liquidating the

company; 2) an end to the occupation of the power plants

by the Federal Police; 3) the implementation of good-

faith negotiations between the Mexican Government and

the Union on the relevant financial and administrative

issues."



The Road to Privatization



Studies have revealed that the Central Light Company

hasn't been funded for years, in preparation to make the

case that it's nonfunctional. A 2005 report showed that

the company had not installed new generating capacity

since 1974.



Privatization of the parastate company lurks behind the

liquidation on October 10. Marchers carried signs that

warned "Today it's us - tomorrow PEMEX [the national oil

company] and SEP [the education system]," and "No to

privatization."



The Central Light Company leases over a thousand

kilometers of fiber optic cable in its electrical

network that it planned to offer to consumers in a

"triple play" package. This combined service of

electricity, telephone, internet and cable threatened

existing economic interests and lucrative future

contracts in the private sector.



Although the Calderon administration has said it isn't

privatizing the state-owned enterprise, SME leader

Martin Esparza revealed that two former secretaries of

energy, Fernando Canales Clarion and Ernesto Martens,

have formed a private company to use the publicly funded

LFC fiber-optic network for internet and voice services,

called WL Communications. Esparza reports that the

businessmen have already negotiated government discounts

and subsidies for the lucrative enterprise.



For now, Central Light has been fused with the Federal

Electricity Commission that manages services in the rest

of the country. The suspicion is that the consolidated

state-owned utility, stripped of a feisty union that

rejected both privatization and the erosion of worker

rights, will eventually be privatized. Pressures to

privatize state-owned enterprises, including the oil

company PEMEX and aspects of the education system, have

characterized the Calderon administration and those of

his predecessors from the PAN political party. The

pattern is familiar - the majority of Mexico's

billionaires made their initial fortunes off state

privatizations under scandalous terms during the Salinas

administration and since then they have formed a

powerful lobby for further privatizations, along with

international finance institutions like the World Bank.



SME member Juan Carlos Saucedo notes that the struggle

to regain the company and the union "is just beginning."

But it will be an uphill battle. The union has demanded

a legal review of the measure and insisted that it

violates the Mexican Constitution. It is currently

working with other unions to possibly call a general

strike. Following the mega-march, the federal government

agreed to open up dialogue with the union, but the talks

were broken off on October 19. The government discarded

any future possibility for negotiations on reversing the

presidential decree and the union declared the dialogue

a "farce," since for them preserving their jobs is the

top priority.



As SME member Apolinar Romero stated at the march, the

issue at hand goes beyond income for workers and rests

on "what kind of future we will leave our children." A

unilateral move to eliminate a union and a state-owned

company sets a terrible precedent for union-busting in

the nation.



Interviews in the Mexican press with government

officials reveal that the obliteration of the union was

carefully planned for over six months. The Calderon

government was just looking for the chance. Ironically,

it was the profound economic crisis in Mexico that

provided the Calderon administration with its

opportunity. 76,000 businesses have closed their doors

over the past months. The Mexican daily La Jornada

reports that 2.8 million workers have lost their jobs in

the Calderon administration. For families living on the

edge, the blow against the union places them between a

rock and a hard place.



Members of the National Association of Democratic

Lawyers and the Latin American Association of Labor

Lawyers stated in a press conference on October 18 that

the decree violates 25 clauses of the Mexican

Constitution and urged workers to file injunctions

against the measure instead of accepting severance pay.

But each day that passes with no wages sees more workers

accepting the government's severance offer.



The administration has launched a campaign to malign the

union, implying that the union members had manipulated

cushy jobs at the expense of consumers. Consumers know

the administrative problems of Central Light, with

unexplained charges in light bills and impossible

bureaucracies. These administrative problems could

easily have been solved long ago, but by analyzing

administrative faults and revamping systems - not

liquidating the company and its union. Official

statistics show that union members made an average of

around $500 dollars a month, and 20,000 members earn

below this level, hardly a princely wage. What the union

did manage to achieve for its members in democratic

processes and benefits was an example for Mexican

unions.



The real question is who will pay for the crisis. The

Calderon administration tried to force through a tax on

basic foods and medicines in the federal budget -

another move to make the poor pay for the inordinate

wealth and privilege of the elite in a vastly unequal

nation. It was blocked at the last minute.



The U.S. government, instead of helping to provide jobs

and labor protections as Mexico sinks into the deepest

crisis in recent history, has concentrated aid in the

Merida Initiative to corrupt Mexican armed forces and

police through the war on drugs. It also continues to

support NAFTA's skewed terms.



It's time to develop a more integral and humane

binational relationship and renegotiate NAFTA. The long-

term effects of allowing this crisis to erode labor

rights and further impoverish an already stricken nation

will only lead to instability throughout the region.

Friday, October 23, 2009

Former Teachers Union President Kicks Off Campaign For May 2010 Election, Affirms PACT


Stakes in TU Vote Higher Than Ever

For Immediate Release

CHICAGO/EWORLDWIRE/Oct. 23, 2009 --- Former Chicago Teachers Union ( CTU ) President Deborah Lynch and the leadership of her union political party, ProActive Chicago Teachers and School Employees ( PACT ), today announced that they will challenge current CTU President Marilyn Stewart in this May's union election. Lynch, former CTU president (2001-2004), teacher at Gage Park High School, and PACT Chair, said that "the stakes in this particular union election couldn't be higher. The CTU has lost over 5,000 union jobs in the last five years alone under Stewart and 100 schools will be closed by next year. Over 80,000 students will have gone to charter schools. There has also been an egregious misappropriation of over $8 million in union funds by Stewart and her team."

"The teacher pension fund is in danger and there has been no vision or leadership coming from the union on such vital and pressing issues as saving our pensions, or on school violence, school turnarounds and member working conditions," said Tanner Elementary School teacher Josephine Perry, PACT's candidate for vice president. Lynch and Perry spoke at the PACT Campaign Kick-off event Friday at the Mayfield Banquet Hall, 5900 S. Archer, to a crowd of over 200 Chicago Public School teachers and staff supporters, union members who want to see change at the CTU .

The PACT team won the top CTU leadership spots in an upset victory in 2001, when it defeated the union political party, the United Progressive Caucus (UPC)in power at CTU for over 30 years. In 2004, in a contentious election which involved charges of vote fraud in the Stewart team's schools, that party returned to power. The national union, the American Federation of Teachers, also of the same political party as Stewart, resolved that election dispute in favor of Stewart.

According to PACT, Stewart has presided over the dismantling of the Chicago Public Schools and the erosion of the power of the once very powerful CTU . "No Chicago union has lost 5,000 members in the last five years. Stewart's team has. Stewart gave up CTU members' hourly wage for overtime pay, agreed to higher health care costs, and supported legislation permitting 45 new charter schools, and she has sold new teachers out by not enforcing the union contract," Lynch continued.

"Now more than ever, we need the experience, integrity, strength and strong outspoken leadership of the Lynch PACT team back at the helm of CTU ," said Perry. "Right now there is no one speaking for the dedicated teachers and staff in our schools, no one countering the attacks on our traditional neighborhood public schools, no one advocating for the working conditions to keep the best and the brightest in our traditional Chicago neighborhood schools. PACT can do those things and will."

Contact:
312-890-7713
312-316-0890

HTML: http://www.eworldwire.com/pressreleases/211317
PDF: http://www.eworldwire.com/pdf/211317.pdf
MOBILE: http://e4mobile.com/view_release.php?id=211317
ONLINE NEWSROOM: http://www.eworldwire.com/newsroom/315275.htm
NEWSROOM RSS FEED: http://newsroom.eworldwire.com/xml/newsrooms/315275.xml
LOGO: http://www.eworldwire.com/newsroom/315275.htm

CONTACT:
Deborah Lynch
PACT: ProActive Chicago Teachers & School Employees
10250 w 144th Place
Orland Park , IL 60462
PHONE. 312-890-7713

SOURCE: PACT: ProActive Chicago Teachers & School Employees

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Obama Wins a Battle as a Teachers' Union Shows Flexibility

A showdown between the White House and the powerful teachers' unions looks, for the moment, a little less likely.

This week in New Haven, Conn., the local teachers union agreed, in a 21-1 vote, to changes widely resisted by unions elsewhere, including tough performance evaluations and fewer job protections for bad teachers.

Education Secretary Arne Duncan, as well as the unions, said the New Haven contract could be repeated in other school districts.


"I rarely say that something is a model or a template for something else, but this is both," said Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, who helped broker the New Haven deal.

"This shows a willingness to go into areas that used to be seen as untouchable," Mr. Duncan said.

His cause for optimism is this: If teachers' unions start showing flexibility in other cities, the administration's high-stakes push to boost graduation rates and improve test scores at public schools could get a lot easier. That might even spare the administration an unwanted fight with a labor force that gave Mr. Obama a big lift in his election.

Excerpts

"I'm not going to be silent where schools are perpetuating poverty and social failure."
-- Read more from Mr. Duncan's interview with the Journal

Under pressure from the Education Department, the country's two powerful teachers unions, Ms. Weingarten's AFT and the larger National Education Association, are already budging in ways that were previously unthinkable. The two unions have a combined membership of 3.6 million employees.

The AFT recently issued a batch of innovation grants to districts that are tying teacher pay to performance -- a practice usually frowned upon by unions. The NEA is taking similar steps to encourage tougher evaluations and to loosen seniority systems, moves that Mr. Duncan called "monumental breakthroughs."

It is also noteworthy that the AFT seems almost as pleased with New Haven as Mr. Duncan.

Public schools in many bigger cities, including New York, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., are seeing the usual tension between unions and school administrators.

In Washington, Chancellor Michelle Rhee has collided with both the national and local unions. The city moved ahead recently with the firing of 388 school employees, nearly 6% of the work force.

In New Haven, by contrast, all sides agreed on the new contract after months of closed-door negotiations. The deal allows the city to close its worst schools and bring in new management, though any new teachers would have to join the union. In exchange, the union got an average 3% raise each year for four years.

"We now have unusual flexibility for a unionized system," said New Haven Mayor John DeStefano.

A big question now is whether Mr. Duncan can proceed with federal efforts to remake U.S. public schools without stirring up storms like the one in Washington.

His one big advantage is financial. The administration plans early next year to distribute $4.3 billion under its "Race to the Top" program to help states set new testing standards, boost teacher quality and help rescue -- or close -- thousands of the worst-performing schools in the U.S. Beyond that, the department has another $5 billion for various school-improvement and innovation grants.

The administration is using its pot of money to get states to revamp rules that bar performance pay and charter schools, which rely on public money but are run outside the public system. Nearly 10 states have taken such steps to qualify for the funds. Select states will have to use the money to reward and encourage the changes.

So far, the administration has avoided a fight with unions. Mr. Duncan meets every few weeks with Ms. Weingarten and the NEA's president, Dennis Von Roekel.

But there is still plenty of room for friction.

Mr. Duncan, the former superintendent of Chicago public schools, got booed by teachers in July when he praised performance-based merit pay at NEA's annual convention. "You can boo," he told the crowd, "just don't throw shoes, please."

A few weeks later, the Education Department released tentative guidelines for changes states have to undertake to qualify for the federal grant money. Unions, school boards, city governments and outside groups responded with more than 1,200 recommended changes.

With the final rules scheduled to be out in mid-November, the unions are warning about limits on their flexibility. The groups are most troubled by Mr. Duncan's quest to link teacher pay to student performance, especially if it is measured only through standardized tests.

"To evaluate a teacher or a school on a single test makes no sense," said Mr. Von Roekel, who used to teach high school math in Arizona.

The unions also are wary of some of Mr. Duncan's other prescriptions, including his proposals to shut down and reorganize many of the country's most troubled schools.

For now, potential antagonists are holding fire. "I may disagree with their tactics," Mr. Von Roekel said, referring to Mr. Duncan and his team. "But I wouldn't question their intent or motivation."

Sunday, October 18, 2009

Email no.6

Hello, good afternoon,

I have let too many things accumulate, so I'll start with the easy stuff, and put the wordy stuff at the end.
Best regards,
JW


TEACHERS DOING ADMIN'S JOB

It's always a problem you take on an administrative task and then have to chase teachers around to get them to do what you need to complete it. You might be getting per session or comp time to do this, but we ain't, and you're not our "boss."

No union member should be telling a fellow member to hand something in, get something done, or do something about anything. That's admin's job. If you run up against some delay, let admin do your dirty work and sort it out.


=========================================================================================================

IF A STUDENT HITS YOU . . .

By accident or not, file both incident reports, with the DoE and the UFT.
This can especially happen at the elem. school level, where tantrums are a little more common than with older kids (though I did once watch a kid nearly ice himself when he put his hand through a glass door in anger and a stream of blood gushed out of his arm in an 8-ft arc.)
A good chart of forms, deadlines, and types of incidents can be found here on the UFT main site.

=========================================================================================================

A COUPLE OF THINGS ON THE DELEGATE ASSEMBLY THIS WEEK

1. THE WAYS PRINCIPALS GET POINTS. Mulgrew told us that if 90% of the staff is logged onto ARIS, the principals get a bunch of points. They also get points if teachers participate on Inquiry Teams and for collaborating on the SLT. So, if principals are running around asking teachers to do things like this, you'll know why. Someone has said that their school is paying per sessin for being on this team, and if so, wonders if there should be a posting for these jobs. Yes.

2. Quality Reviews. The union wants to push back on Quality Reviews on the grounds that it has nothing to do with our jobs or our students. The only person affected by Quality Review is the principal, who wants to "chase the points." If you feel you have been pressured to participate in the QRs, the union wants you to send in your name, tel. no. and your school to ARoss@uft.org. Ross is setting up a task force on this.

3. SLTs. The UFT is pushing for fully functional School Leadership Teams, which are mostly . . . how can I say this nicely? . . . not.
In the old law, principals had final say on the budget, but the SLT had a final say on the CEP (Comprehensive Educational Plan).
That didn't work out well. In the new school governance law that took effect last August (and the DoE didn't tell anyone about), the CEP must be written first and the budget aligned to IT. The CEPs have to be done before the end of April, when the next budget comes in. The UFT is encouraging members to sign up for training sessions on SLTs and to bring the parents as well. (UFT website link on new law.)

There is also a blog I've just noticed, run by teacher Jim Calantjis. You can read his bio in the sidebar, but this caught my eye:

"I became an advocate for SLT empowerment in early 2004 as I saw that
the NYCDOE was not supporting the collaborative role of SLT's as
mandated by State law and Chancellor's Regulations. As a result,
SLT's were shut out of the budget process and Principals began to
dominate teams. Due to lack of training and lack of DOE committment,
most teams are not functioning today. My purpose is to support parents
and teachers on SLT's through this web site." Other than his stated
goal, I don't know anything more about this.

4. Political activity. The union wants to have a point person for every district who will be able to take the load of chapter leaders rounding up people for political action. It would be someone who can bring members in to the district office, talk to them about issues, and create software to sign people up. They say they want to create a "small army" - but I'm not sure of what. On the outside it might look like a political action structure, but on the inside a strategy for pulling people into UNITY caucus, which runs the union (to many of us undemocratically) and has to win the spring elections.

5. Losts of people are still saying they've ben asked to do individual student goals. This is wrong. The union wants to know about it.

6. The low NAEP scores indicate, according NYS Ed Commissioner of David Steiner: "Our tests aren't working." We knew that.
Merryl Tisch (head of the NYS Bd of Regents) is apparently adamant that what we're doing to kids is wrong. Nevertheless, we are the teachers of these kids and the union's position on the low scores is that DoE has not been allowing us to teach them the way we have to.

Also important: NAEP Math Results Hold Bad News for NCLB and NY's Testing Mess, by Diane Ravitch

7. The union is holding firm on ATRs: The DoE has to manage hiring better, it's not our fault. (See below what TJC has to say on ATRs.)


See more on the DA in the ICE blog.

=========================================================================================================

SHORT ON MONEY?

We heard at one of the meetings this week that the governor is asking for midyear cuts to education of $239,000,000 ($170,000 per school). Actually the website says $223 million, so I don't know which figure is correct. We'll have another bad state budget next April and a bad one from the city in June. From the UFT website:
to tell them how these cuts would hurt our students.
In addition, you should have received a chapter leader alert e-mail
yesterday asking you to complete our online budget cut survey.
If you work in an elementary or middle school, take this survey.
If you work in a high school, take this version of the survey."

Also heard is that that principals are asking teachers to spend monies allocated for something else to help fund things unrelated to their programs. One teacher writes: "My principal has asked to use some of our pre-k funds to buy supplies for the art teacher. At another school the principal wants to use pre-k funds for kindergaten classrooms. Supplies are nill everywhere."
We should be aware of these kinds of requests and disorders and send them to the UFT (I don't know if that will do any good) or to the activists you know will follow up on or otherwise expose DoE irregularities.

DUES CHANGES: I can't find this onlin, but in the NY Teacher hardcopy, the dues were changed Sept 1, 09.
Per paycheck, to cite some categories:

Teachers $48.05
Guid. Couns 48.99
Psychologists/Soc. Workers 49.74
Ed. administrators 49.21
Secs 36.41
Lab spec. 40.79
Lab techs 35.13
Paras 24.03
Sign language interps 22.18


======================================================================================================

QUESTIONABLE TESTING in Elem. Schools :


From the website of TimeOutforTesting.com (a statewide coalition of parent, educator, business, community, and civil rights orgs in NYS opposed to excessive and high stakes exams) is concerned about the DoE's plans for instituting standardized testing K-grade 2. :

"The good news is that nothing was implemented at the start of this school year.
However, we remain quite worried about the future.
The DOE has indicated that it wants some kind of test in the early grades so
that it can use the scores to make evaluations about teachers and schools. If that
happens, there will likely be LOTS of test prep (at the expense of meaningful
learning) in our youngest children's classrooms as teachers and principals feel
pressure to raise test scores. Additionally, our children could be branded with
a score that in no way reflects their true talents and achievements." [You can
sign an online petition and pass on the link.]

Here's what one elem. school teacher circulated in a list-serv:
"We were "trained" to give this Pre-K test ... which we have to call an assessment ... today. They say 20 minutes per child, but everyone agreed it was going to take longer especially at first, that it was taking away from class teaching/interaction time, that at some point it was going to be used against the children and teachers and any good teacher could assess the same skills without having the official data. Some of the scoring is very subjective despite the guide we should use as our "bible." No regard is taken for the wide variety in children this age. Non-English speakers other than Spanish will be assessed at this time. So the Spanish ELL's and the English speakers will be "labeled" first. I could go on ... It makes me furious that we have come to this. It is the same with K-2."

===========================================================================================

Do you have a Charter School in your Public School building?

Discuss and strategize how to fight back.
Hear what educators and communities have done to organize.
Find out what is happening around the city.

Tuesday, October, 20 - 4:30 PM CUNY Graduate Center – Room 541
34th St. & 5th Ave. (1 train to 33rdSt. N,Q,R,W,F,V,B,D to 34th St.) - Bring ID

Will a charter school take over your public school's art, music, AIS, library or science rooms? You are not alone.
PRIVATE Charter Schools are pushing into more and more of our PUBLIC Schools.
Help build a grassroots movement of educators to mobilize against this takeover of public school space!



===========================================================================================

SAME FIGHT, DIFFERENT CITIES : Ed Deform all over

WASHINGTON, DC

Posted here are 15 questions the Washington Post is asking the infamous chancellor of DC schools Michelle Rhee, who laid off 388 teachers and support staff early this month.

Part of the first question goes: "You terminated 248 teachers in June, while at the same time you hired 934. Then you laid off 229. Can you explain how this adds up?"

As I write this, the union seems to have jumped on board and are asking for a probe into the layoffs. Better late than never, but honestly, what does it need to wake these sleeping giants up?
DETROIT

Here's an extract of a letter that members of the Detroit teachers union sent around telling people to come to the membership meeting 10 days ago. Rob Bobb is the chancellor-type running the public schools, Johnson is the pres. of the teachers union.

AFT Pres. Randi Weingarten is a player, now that she's cut a few (but far from all) of her chains to NYC.
The red highlighting is mine.

. . . .We must fight back now, by taking back our union on October 8th.
For months, Keith Johnson has allowed Bobb’s propaganda offensive to go unopposed day after day. Instead of standing up for the DFT membership, and telling Detroit the truth about Bobb’s attacks, Johnson has acted as Bobb's lieutenant.
"Do it with us, not to us" has been Johnson's pathetic motto since that day last spring when he and [our girl] AFT President Randi Weingarten shared the stage with Bobb at Cobo Hall. In other words, instead of fighting for real improvements in schools, Johnson wants us to become willing participants in our own demise . . .

But DFT members don't have to accept this! . . .
The people of Detroit do not want their public schools turned into charters, or their teachers turned into at-will employees with no rights. They simply want the kind of resources and real school improvements that Detroit teachers have always demanded when we have fought back.
And Bobb is much weaker than he pretends. The truth is that he cannot proceed in his efforts without DFT complicity at the negotiating table, and without the illusion of popular support he hopes to obtain if he can lie and cheat his way to winning passage of Proposal S in November.
First, we must defeat any contract vote that involves either of the two main tactics currently being used against teachers in contract negotiations in other large US cities – (1) weakening of seniority and other related key contractual protections; (2) a divide-and-conquer agreement that destroys protections at some schools (variously called the “Superintendent’s schools,” “Centers of Excellence” or other such nonsense) in order to pave the way for destroying rights at all schools shortly thereafter.
“Reformers” such as Bobb and US Secretary of Education Duncan want to turn the teaching profession into a revolving door, where people work for two or three years and then burn out or get kicked out. Bobb and Duncan’s real priority isn’t educating students; it’s cutting public school budgets and converting education into a for-profit industry. Student success requires a stable workforce of dedicated, experienced, professional educators. Seniority must be defended!
The whole plan behind S is to open new schools that are run under the charter school model -- curriculum stripped of everything but rote learning and no electives, revolving door of teachers who have no rights, etc.. These “Superintendent’s Schools” or “Centers of Excellence” will get all the resources. The other schools will be run into the ground all the faster.

NEW YORK CITY

A great report on what's going on in NYC: Did Bloomberg Flunk?
It's by political scientist Brian d'Agostino, former teacher and CL.


======================================================================================

How To Survive The Corrupt Investigation Process That The DOE Perpetrates On The Teacher

You can read this in full on Chaz's blog, but let me just quote you something he says about how principals can be "prone to ask leading or misdirected questions that lead to erroneous statements":


Principal: "Did the teacher threaten to hit you"?
Student: "No".
Principal": Did you think the teacher could hit you"?
Student: "Yes"
Principal: So you were scared that the teacher could hit you"?
Student: "I guess so".

======================================================================================

TJC and ICE JOINT SLATE in the March UFT elections__,

ICE's full platform on: http://uftelections2010.blogspot.com/

For more information on becoming involved with the ICE/TJC slate, write: ICEUFT@gmail.com
This link for a flyer on ICE's main positions.



This is from TJC's latest flyer, which I'm sure you can access on their website later today, but not now as I'm preparing this.

CONTRACT ALERT: DEFEND OUR ATRS!

More than 1,500 UFT members are now ATRs: second class union members whose professional rights are being violated every day. The DOE and the Mayor have worked hard to create this crisis. Without any justification, they stigmatized these colleagues as bad teachers, allowed principals to hire new, inexperienced teachers, trained new classes of "Teaching Fellows," and blocked a retirement incentive that would have opened up positions.